Skip to content

Meta-Guide.com

Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Directory
  • Videography
  • Pages
  • Index
  • Random
Menu

Which one is better for coreference resolution in terms of speed and accuracy: Stanford CoreNLP or Apache OpenNLP?

Posted on 2015/03/282016/09/15 by mendicott

Which one is better for coreference resolution in terms of speed and accuracy: Stanford CoreNLP or Apache OpenNLP?

I can’t speak to speed and accuracy; however, I can say that for the year 2014, CoreNLP is cited over twice as many times as OpenNLP within the context of coreference resolution in Google Scholar.

See also my quick and dirty webpages:

  • Apache OpenNLP & Coreference Resolution 2014 | Meta-Guide.com
  • Stanford CoreNLP & Coreference Resolution 2014 | Meta-Guide.com
  • Yann LeCun’s Vision and Meta’s Diverging Paths on Artificial Intelligence
  • Meta’s AI Bots Quietly Introduce Automated Moderation Tools into Facebook Groups
  • Meta’s Lockout of Marcus Endicott Exposes Strategic Blindness in the West’s AI Race
  • Meta Superintelligence Labs Marks Meta’s Strategic Consolidation of Its AI Efforts
  • How Ordinary People Fund, Enable, and Legitimize the AI War Machine

Popular Content

New Content

 

Contents of this website may not be reproduced without prior written permission.

Copyright © 2011-2025 Marcus L Endicott

©2025 Meta-Guide.com | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme